[terroreman]

204Hg *204AU B- DECAY 1984CR01 94NDS 199411
204 80 I 18 23 0 15 1204AU 0
H TYP=FUL$AUT=M. R. SCHMORAK$CIT=NDS 72,409 (1994)$CUT=1-Sep-1994$
204AU P 0 (2-) 39.8 S 9 3800 SY
N 0.91 10 1 1.0
CN NR Based on the assumption that IB- to GS is negligible
1C Natural HG(N,P) E(N)=14 MEV; gammas GE(LI), GG, G(T) (1984Cr01)
CG From 1984Cr01, assignment to 204AU based on T1/2 and on
2CG GG-coin; other: 1972Pa06. For EG<400 sensitivity was reduced by shield.
CG E(D) Assigned to both 204AU and 202AU (1984Cr01)
CG M From adopted G's
1C HG(N,P) E(N)=14-15 MEV; gammas GE(LI), GG-coin scin-GE(LI), BG-coin
2C scin-GE(LI). Earlier assignment by 1967Wa23 of T1/2=4 S, to 204AU, is
3C not confirmed by 1972Pa06.
CG All intense gammas are in coin with EB>500.
CB Endpoint energy of AP 3300 with T1/2=30-40 S can belong
2CB to the decay of either 202AU or 204AU. 1967Wa23 report
3CB E(B-)=3500 200 with T1/2 AP 30 S and E(B-)=4500 300 with
4CB T1/2 AP 4 S. 1972Pa06 deduce a weak B- feeding to 204HG GS
5CB from the high RI(204HG)/RI(202HG) ratio. 1984Cr01 deduce IB- to GS<10%
6CB from estimate of (N,P) cross sections; other IB- branches are from
7CB G+CE intensity balance, assuming negligible feeding to GS
CB LOGFT Uncertainty does not include the uncertainty in Q-.
CL J From adopted levels
0 G 654.9 4 9.0 8
0F G FLAG=D
0 CG T1/2=70 S 20, may be due to 203AU B- decay (the value in
02CG the literature is 53 S 2 for EG AP 690 KEV. 654.6G was reported by
03CG 1972Ba53)
0 G 1817.4 6 0.16 7
1 L 0 0+
B 10 LT 8.5 GT 1U?
S B EAV= 1567.92 $
2 L 436.57 5 2+
1 G 436.56 5 100 4 E2 0.04
3 L 1128.30 134+
B 2 LT 8.4 GT 1U?
S B EAV= 1078.48 $
2 G 691.74 15 26.4 8 E2
4 L 1828.72 12 (2)
B 21.7 6 5.4 1
S B EAV= 808.98 $
2 G 1392.15 11 24.2 6
5 L 1841.39 11 1+,2+
B 4.5 3 6.1 1
S B EAV= 803.57 $
2 G 1404.82 12 4.24 20
1 G 1841.38 19 2.91 11
6 L 1851.29 11 (2+)
B 30.9 7 5.3 1
S B EAV= 799.35 $
3 G 723.00 16 24.4 7
2 G 1414.72 11 9.6 3
? 1 G 1851.7 4 0.28 LE
? 1F G FLAG=D
7 L 1947.70 11 1+,2+
B 26.5 7 5.2 1
S B EAV= 758.41 $
2 G 1511.10 12 27.7 7
1 G 1947.76 20 1.47 11
8 L 1989.33 15 (2+,3-)
B 5.7 2 5.8 1
S B EAV= 740.80 $
2 G 1552.76 14 6.51 19
9 L 2088.78 19 (1,2+)
B 1.1 1 6.5 1
S B EAV= 698.83 $
1 G 2088.77 19 1.15 7
10 L 2117.0 5 (2)+
B 0.20 7 7.3 5
2 G 1680.4 5 0.22 7
2 CG E$placement by evaluator based on the placement of the 1680.9 1
22CG GAMMA in (N,N'G)
11 L 2140.81 17 1,2,3
B 3.1 1 6.0 1
S B EAV= 676.99 $
2 G 1704.24 16 3.42 14
12 L 2264.37 19 1,2,3
B 2.0 2 6.2 1
2 G 1827.80 18 2.23 14
2 CG E$placement by evaluator based on the placement of the 1827.4 1
22CG GAMMA in (N,N'G)
13 L 2300.3 8(2)
3 G 1172.0 7 1.8 4
14 L 2386.4 9 1(+),2+
B 0.10 5 7.2 3
1 G 2386.4 9 0.11 5
1 CG E$placement by evaluator based on the placement of the 2385.9 4
12CG GAMMA in (N,N'G)
? 15 L 2395.6 4 (2+,3-)
? 15 CL E$not seen in (N,N'G)
? 5 G 554.7 3 3.0 5
2 G 1959.0 4 0.29 LE
2F G FLAG=D
16 L 2466.0 3 (1,2,3)+
B 0.34 6 6.9 1
2 G 2029.4 3 0.38 6
2 CG E$placement by evaluator based on the placement of the 2028.9 2
22CG GAMMA in (N,N'G)
17 L 2726.7 3 (2+,3)
B 0.6 2 6.0 2
S B EAV= 436.60 $
4 G 897.9 6 0.30 19
3 G 1598.4 3 0.37 7
18 L 2812.84 25 3-
B 0.66 7 5.9 1
S B EAV= 402.44 $
2 G 2376.26 24 0.72 7

204Hg *204TL EC DECAY 94NDS 199411
204 80 I 1 0 0 1 1204TL 0
H TYP=FUL$AUT=M. R. SCHMORAK$CIT=NDS 72,409 (1994)$CUT=1-Sep-1994$
204TL P 0 2- 3.78 Y 2 347.3 15
N 0.0290 12 1
CN BR$from I(XK)=1.64% 7 of 1990Sc08, K fluorescent yield=0.965 and
2CN CK/EC=0.5867 16 (based on Q=347.3 15 and theory for first forbidden
3CN unique EC decay). Other: 1962Le05,
2CN 1964Ch17, 1961Jo12, 1966Kl02, 1967Ha39, 1980La02.
1C CL/CK=0.42 5 (1961Jo12), 0.48 4 (1963Ro32), 0.60 6 (1964Ch17),
2C 0.55 5 (1966Kl02). From Q value and EC decay theory CL/CK=0.513 4
C 3.2E-5 5 internal bremsstrahlung photons per CK (1973La17).
2C 2.17E-5 26 photons per CK (1979Zi02). Q+ of 357 15 deduced
3C (1979Zi02).
CG No gammas detected. XK absolute intensities studied in
2CG 4PI geometry. XKA2=0.47 2, XKA1=0.81 3, XKB1=0.273 10, XKB2=0.081 3
3CG per 100 decays (1990Sc08).
1 L 0 0+
E 100 9.521 21 1U
S E CK=0.5867 16 $CL=0.3007 11 $CM+=0.1126 5
CE E E(EC)=385 20 (1973La17), 376 20 (1956Ju07), 393 10 (1962Bi04)

204Hg *204HG(E,E') 1989BUZP 94NDS 199411
204 80 I 60 0 0 0 0 0
H TYP=FUL$AUT=M. R. SCHMORAK$CIT=NDS 72,409 (1994)$CUT=1-Sep-1994$
C 93.7% 204HG, 6LI-204HG amalgam target. E(E)=83-477 MEV,
2C mag spect. FWHM=8E-3% to 3E-2%. PWBA analysis (1989BuZP)
CL J$From 1989BuZP, based on fitting the cross sections as functions of
2CL the momentum transfer with PWBA calculations.
CL E$The listed uncertainties are statistical only; the systematic
2CL errors are estimated by 1989BuZP to range from 2 KEV for levels below
3CL 2462 KEV to 5 KEV for levels above 4413 KEV.
1 L 0 0+
2 L 436.7 23 2+
22 L BE2=0.429 5
3 L 1128 6 4+
32 L BE4=45E-3 6
4 L 1636 12 0+
4 CL M(E0)=1.06 e(fm){+2} 70
5 L 1944 33
6 L 1974 60
7 L 2047 70
8 L 2090 AP
9 L 2124 30
10 L 2200 60
11 L 2262 5 5-
112 L BE5=41E-3 9
12 L 2299 7 7-
122 L BE7=32E-4 13
13 L 2359 5
14 L 2397 12
15 L 2462 29
16 L 2507 40
17 L 2570 AP
18 L 259E1 12
19 L 2673 6 3-
192 L BE3=42E-2 4
20 L 2719 7
21 L 2730 AP
22 L 2760 AP
23 L 2813 7 3-
232 L BE3=14E-2 2
24 L 2883 43
25 L 2925 37
26 L 3017 28 4+
262 L BE4=40E-3 13
27 L 3096 18
28 L 3187 70
29 L 3222 24
30 L 3316 9 3-
302 L BE3=109E-3 13
31 L 3361 8 5-
312 L BE5=36E-3 5
32 L 3426 15
33 L 3475 14
34 L 3539 70
35 L 3594 35
36 L 3670 AP
37 L 3720 AP
38 L 3750 70
39 L 3820 70
40 L 3860 AP
41 L 3919 34
42 L 3968 29
43 L 4033 15
44 L 4100 17 4+
442 L BE4=54E-3 6
45 L 4147 14
46 L 4210 AP
47 L 4245 7
48 L 4348 11
49 L 4380 AP
50 L 4413 15
51 L 4493 9
52 L 4539 7
53 L 4610 27
54 L 4663 27
55 L 470E1 10
56 L 4723 7
57 L 4815 13
58 L 4895 24
59 L 4915 26
60 L 4959 60

204Hg *204HG(N,N'G) 1989GA07 94NDS 199411
204 80 I 27 31 0 0 0 0
H TYP=FUL$AUT=M. R. SCHMORAK$CIT=NDS 72,409 (1994)$CUT=1-Sep-1994$
C E(N)=1.5-3 MEV, 98% 204HG, G(THETA) GE(LI), excitation function
2C 1.5 to 3 MEV (1989Ga07).
CG RI$At E(N)=2.80 MEV, uncertainties include 5% syst uncertainty for
2CG EG>500 and 10% syst uncertainty for EG<500
CL J$From 1989Ga07 based on G(THETA), G deexcitation, and excit function.
0 G 615.7 3 2.8 11
0 G 738.1 3 3.7 14
0 G 806.7 3 5.9 13
1 L 0 0+
2 L 436.57 4 2+
1 G 436.58 4 1000
3 L 1128.37 9 4+
2 G 691.8 1 331 18
4 L 1635.77 11 0+
2 G 1199.2 1 27 3
5 L 1716.77 11 (2)
2 G 1280.2 1 26 3
6 L 1828.87 11 2+
2 G 1392.3 1 79 5
7 L 1841.49 8 1,2+
2 G 1405.0 1 36 3
1 G 1841.4 1 25.3 24
8 L 1851.42 9 (2+)
3 G 723.0 1 55 4
2 G 1414.9 1 22.2 22
9 L 1947.67 11 (2+)
2 G 1511.1 1 68 5
10 L 1989.37 11 (2+)
2 G 1552.8 1 62 4
11 L 2088.51 10 (2+)
1 G 2088.5 1 27 3
12 L 2094.48 21 3,4+
2 G 1657.9 2 14.7 21
13 L 2117.48 10 2+
2 G 1680.9 1 32 3
1 G 2117.5 2 13 3
14 L 2131.28 21
2 G 1694.7 2 11.8 21
15 L 2140.88 11 (1,2,3)
2 G 1704.3 1 29 3
16 L 2191.17 14 6+
3 G 1062.8 1 15.1 18
17 L 2236.07 14
3 G 1107.7 1 31 3
18 L 2263.07 14 5-
3 G 1134.7 1 31 3
19 L 2263.98 11
2 G 1827.4 1 37 3
20 L 2295.68 11
2 G 1859.1 1 29 3
21 L 2300.32 13 (2)
3 G 1172.0 1 27 3
2 G 1863.3 3 5.8 17
22 L 2385.9 4
1 G 2385.9 4 19 4
23 L 2465.48 21
2 G 2028.9 2 17 3
24 L 2514.57 22
3 G 1386.2 2 10.8 18
25 L 2568.97 14
3 G 1440.6 1 7.7 15
26 L 2628.28 11
2 G 2191.7 1 4.4 10
27 L 2675.34 18 (3-)
3 G 1547.0 2 9.2 19
2 G 2238.7 3 11.6 23