[terroreman]

204Hg *204AU B- DECAY 1984CR01 94NDS 199411
204 80 I 18 23 0 15 1204AU 0
H TYP=FUL$AUT=M. R. SCHMORAK$CIT=NDS 72,409 (1994)$CUT=1-Sep-1994$
204AU P 0 (2-) 39.8 S 9 3800 SY
N 0.91 10 1 1.0
CN NR Based on the assumption that IB- to GS is negligible
1C Natural HG(N,P) E(N)=14 MEV; gammas GE(LI), GG, G(T) (1984Cr01)
CG From 1984Cr01, assignment to 204AU based on T1/2 and on
2CG GG-coin; other: 1972Pa06. For EG<400 sensitivity was reduced by shield.
CG E(D) Assigned to both 204AU and 202AU (1984Cr01)
CG M From adopted G's
1C HG(N,P) E(N)=14-15 MEV; gammas GE(LI), GG-coin scin-GE(LI), BG-coin
2C scin-GE(LI). Earlier assignment by 1967Wa23 of T1/2=4 S, to 204AU, is
3C not confirmed by 1972Pa06.
CG All intense gammas are in coin with EB>500.
CB Endpoint energy of AP 3300 with T1/2=30-40 S can belong
2CB to the decay of either 202AU or 204AU. 1967Wa23 report
3CB E(B-)=3500 200 with T1/2 AP 30 S and E(B-)=4500 300 with
4CB T1/2 AP 4 S. 1972Pa06 deduce a weak B- feeding to 204HG GS
5CB from the high RI(204HG)/RI(202HG) ratio. 1984Cr01 deduce IB- to GS<10%
6CB from estimate of (N,P) cross sections; other IB- branches are from
7CB G+CE intensity balance, assuming negligible feeding to GS
CB LOGFT Uncertainty does not include the uncertainty in Q-.
CL J From adopted levels
0 G 654.9 4 9.0 8
0F G FLAG=D
0 CG T1/2=70 S 20, may be due to 203AU B- decay (the value in
02CG the literature is 53 S 2 for EG AP 690 KEV. 654.6G was reported by
03CG 1972Ba53)
0 G 1817.4 6 0.16 7
1 L 0 0+
B 10 LT 8.5 GT 1U?
S B EAV= 1567.92 $
2 L 436.57 5 2+
1 G 436.56 5 100 4 E2 0.04
3 L 1128.30 134+
B 2 LT 8.4 GT 1U?
S B EAV= 1078.48 $
2 G 691.74 15 26.4 8 E2
4 L 1828.72 12 (2)
B 21.7 6 5.4 1
S B EAV= 808.98 $
2 G 1392.15 11 24.2 6
5 L 1841.39 11 1+,2+
B 4.5 3 6.1 1
S B EAV= 803.57 $
2 G 1404.82 12 4.24 20
1 G 1841.38 19 2.91 11
6 L 1851.29 11 (2+)
B 30.9 7 5.3 1
S B EAV= 799.35 $
3 G 723.00 16 24.4 7
2 G 1414.72 11 9.6 3
? 1 G 1851.7 4 0.28 LE
? 1F G FLAG=D
7 L 1947.70 11 1+,2+
B 26.5 7 5.2 1
S B EAV= 758.41 $
2 G 1511.10 12 27.7 7
1 G 1947.76 20 1.47 11
8 L 1989.33 15 (2+,3-)
B 5.7 2 5.8 1
S B EAV= 740.80 $
2 G 1552.76 14 6.51 19
9 L 2088.78 19 (1,2+)
B 1.1 1 6.5 1
S B EAV= 698.83 $
1 G 2088.77 19 1.15 7
10 L 2117.0 5 (2)+
B 0.20 7 7.3 5
2 G 1680.4 5 0.22 7
2 CG E$placement by evaluator based on the placement of the 1680.9 1
22CG GAMMA in (N,N'G)
11 L 2140.81 17 1,2,3
B 3.1 1 6.0 1
S B EAV= 676.99 $
2 G 1704.24 16 3.42 14
12 L 2264.37 19 1,2,3
B 2.0 2 6.2 1
2 G 1827.80 18 2.23 14
2 CG E$placement by evaluator based on the placement of the 1827.4 1
22CG GAMMA in (N,N'G)
13 L 2300.3 8(2)
3 G 1172.0 7 1.8 4
14 L 2386.4 9 1(+),2+
B 0.10 5 7.2 3
1 G 2386.4 9 0.11 5
1 CG E$placement by evaluator based on the placement of the 2385.9 4
12CG GAMMA in (N,N'G)
? 15 L 2395.6 4 (2+,3-)
? 15 CL E$not seen in (N,N'G)
? 5 G 554.7 3 3.0 5
2 G 1959.0 4 0.29 LE
2F G FLAG=D
16 L 2466.0 3 (1,2,3)+
B 0.34 6 6.9 1
2 G 2029.4 3 0.38 6
2 CG E$placement by evaluator based on the placement of the 2028.9 2
22CG GAMMA in (N,N'G)
17 L 2726.7 3 (2+,3)
B 0.6 2 6.0 2
S B EAV= 436.60 $
4 G 897.9 6 0.30 19
3 G 1598.4 3 0.37 7
18 L 2812.84 25 3-
B 0.66 7 5.9 1
S B EAV= 402.44 $
2 G 2376.26 24 0.72 7

204Hg *204TL EC DECAY 94NDS 199411
204 80 I 1 0 0 1 1204TL 0
H TYP=FUL$AUT=M. R. SCHMORAK$CIT=NDS 72,409 (1994)$CUT=1-Sep-1994$
204TL P 0 2- 3.78 Y 2 347.3 15
N 0.0290 12 1
CN BR$from I(XK)=1.64% 7 of 1990Sc08, K fluorescent yield=0.965 and
2CN CK/EC=0.5867 16 (based on Q=347.3 15 and theory for first forbidden
3CN unique EC decay). Other: 1962Le05,
2CN 1964Ch17, 1961Jo12, 1966Kl02, 1967Ha39, 1980La02.
1C CL/CK=0.42 5 (1961Jo12), 0.48 4 (1963Ro32), 0.60 6 (1964Ch17),
2C 0.55 5 (1966Kl02). From Q value and EC decay theory CL/CK=0.513 4
C 3.2E-5 5 internal bremsstrahlung photons per CK (1973La17).
2C 2.17E-5 26 photons per CK (1979Zi02). Q+ of 357 15 deduced
3C (1979Zi02).
CG No gammas detected. XK absolute intensities studied in
2CG 4PI geometry. XKA2=0.47 2, XKA1=0.81 3, XKB1=0.273 10, XKB2=0.081 3
3CG per 100 decays (1990Sc08).
1 L 0 0+
E 100 9.521 21 1U
S E CK=0.5867 16 $CL=0.3007 11 $CM+=0.1126 5
CE E E(EC)=385 20 (1973La17), 376 20 (1956Ju07), 393 10 (1962Bi04)

204Hg *204HG(E,E') 1989BUZP 94NDS 199411
204 80 I 60 0 0 0 0 0
H TYP=FUL$AUT=M. R. SCHMORAK$CIT=NDS 72,409 (1994)$CUT=1-Sep-1994$
C 93.7% 204HG, 6LI-204HG amalgam target. E(E)=83-477 MEV,
2C mag spect. FWHM=8E-3% to 3E-2%. PWBA analysis (1989BuZP)
CL J$From 1989BuZP, based on fitting the cross sections as functions of
2CL the momentum transfer with PWBA calculations.
CL E$The listed uncertainties are statistical only; the systematic
2CL errors are estimated by 1989BuZP to range from 2 KEV for levels below
3CL 2462 KEV to 5 KEV for levels above 4413 KEV.
1 L 0 0+
2 L 436.7 23 2+
22 L BE2=0.429 5
3 L 1128 6 4+
32 L BE4=45E-3 6
4 L 1636 12 0+
4 CL M(E0)=1.06 e(fm){+2} 70
5 L 1944 33
6 L 1974 60
7 L 2047 70
8 L 2090 AP
9 L 2124 30
10 L 2200 60
11 L 2262 5 5-
112 L BE5=41E-3 9
12 L 2299 7 7-
122 L BE7=32E-4 13
13 L 2359 5
14 L 2397 12
15 L 2462 29
16 L 2507 40
17 L 2570 AP
18 L 259E1 12
19 L 2673 6 3-
192 L BE3=42E-2 4
20 L 2719 7
21 L 2730 AP
22 L 2760 AP
23 L 2813 7 3-
232 L BE3=14E-2 2
24 L 2883 43
25 L 2925 37
26 L 3017 28 4+
262 L BE4=40E-3 13
27 L 3096 18
28 L 3187 70
29 L 3222 24
30 L 3316 9 3-
302 L BE3=109E-3 13
31 L 3361 8 5-
312 L BE5=36E-3 5
32 L 3426 15
33 L 3475 14
34 L 3539 70
35 L 3594 35
36 L 3670 AP
37 L 3720 AP
38 L 3750 70
39 L 3820 70
40 L 3860 AP
41 L 3919 34
42 L 3968 29
43 L 4033 15
44 L 4100 17 4+
442 L BE4=54E-3 6
45 L 4147 14
46 L 4210 AP
47 L 4245 7
48 L 4348 11
49 L 4380 AP
50 L 4413 15
51 L 4493 9
52 L 4539 7
53 L 4610 27
54 L 4663 27
55 L 470E1 10
56 L 4723 7
57 L 4815 13
58 L 4895 24
59 L 4915 26
60 L 4959 60

204Hg *204HG(N,N'G) 1989GA07 94NDS 199411
204 80 I 27 31 0 0 0 0
H TYP=FUL$AUT=M. R. SCHMORAK$CIT=NDS 72,409 (1994)$CUT=1-Sep-1994$
C E(N)=1.5-3 MEV, 98% 204HG, G(THETA) GE(LI), excitation function
2C 1.5 to 3 MEV (1989Ga07).
CG RI$At E(N)=2.80 MEV, uncertainties include 5% syst uncertainty for
2CG EG>500 and 10% syst uncertainty for EG<500
CL J$From 1989Ga07 based on G(THETA), G deexcitation, and excit function.
0 G 615.7 3 2.8 11
0 G 738.1 3 3.7 14
0 G 806.7 3 5.9 13
1 L 0 0+
2 L 436.57 4 2+
1 G 436.58 4 1000
3 L 1128.37 9 4+
2 G 691.8 1 331 18
4 L 1635.77 11 0+
2 G 1199.2 1 27 3
5 L 1716.77 11 (2)
2 G 1280.2 1 26 3
6 L 1828.87 11 2+
2 G 1392.3 1 79 5
7 L 1841.49 8 1,2+
2 G 1405.0 1 36 3
1 G 1841.4 1 25.3 24
8 L 1851.42 9 (2+)
3 G 723.0 1 55 4
2 G 1414.9 1 22.2 22
9 L 1947.67 11 (2+)
2 G 1511.1 1 68 5
10 L 1989.37 11 (2+)
2 G 1552.8 1 62 4
11 L 2088.51 10 (2+)
1 G 2088.5 1 27 3
12 L 2094.48 21 3,4+
2 G 1657.9 2 14.7 21
13 L 2117.48 10 2+
2 G 1680.9 1 32 3
1 G 2117.5 2 13 3
14 L 2131.28 21
2 G 1694.7 2 11.8 21
15 L 2140.88 11 (1,2,3)
2 G 1704.3 1 29 3
16 L 2191.17 14 6+
3 G 1062.8 1 15.1 18
17 L 2236.07 14
3 G 1107.7 1 31 3
18 L 2263.07 14 5-
3 G 1134.7 1 31 3
19 L 2263.98 11
2 G 1827.4 1 37 3
20 L 2295.68 11
2 G 1859.1 1 29 3
21 L 2300.32 13 (2)
3 G 1172.0 1 27 3
2 G 1863.3 3 5.8 17
22 L 2385.9 4
1 G 2385.9 4 19 4
23 L 2465.48 21
2 G 2028.9 2 17 3
24 L 2514.57 22
3 G 1386.2 2 10.8 18
25 L 2568.97 14
3 G 1440.6 1 7.7 15
26 L 2628.28 11
2 G 2191.7 1 4.4 10
27 L 2675.34 18 (3-)
3 G 1547.0 2 9.2 19
2 G 2238.7 3 11.6 23

[terroreman]

204Hg *204HG(P,P') 1991HO07 94NDS 199411
204 80 I 47 0 0 0 0 0
H TYP=FUL$AUT=M. R. SCHMORAK$CIT=NDS 72,409 (1994)$CUT=1-Sep-1994$
C E(P)=28 MEV, 98.2% 204HG, mag spect FWHM=17 KEV, p'(THETA), coupled
2C channel calc (1991Ho07).
CL J$From 1991Ho07 based on p'(THETA) and on unpublished (E,E') data of
2CL 1989BuZP
CL S$BETA(L) values are quoted based on coupled-channels analysis
1 L 0 0+
2 L 437 3 2+ -0.069
3 L 1128 4 4+ -0.049
4 L 1632 11 0+
5 L 1714 6
6 L 1836 5
7 L 1985 7
8 L 2099 8
9 L 2137 9
10 L 2183 4 6+ -0.013
11 L 2257 4 5- 0.033
12 L 2293 4 7- -0.021
13 L 2398 9
14 L 2463 9
15 L 2509 5
16 L 2672 4 3- 0.089
17 L 2710 4
18 L 2759 4
19 L 2813 4 3- 0.046
20 L 2866 4
21 L 3021 4 (4+) 0.016
22 L 3112 4 (4+) 0.016
23 L 3227 4 (5-) 0.020
24 L 3315 4 3- 0.048
25 L 3364 4 5- 0.049
26 L 3417 4
27 L 3439 4
28 L 3496 5
29 L 3528 6
30 L 3585 4
31 L 3618 6
32 L 3664 9
33 L 3697 5
34 L 3712 7
35 L 3750 4
36 L 3779 4
37 L 3833 8
38 L 3869 7
39 L 3923 9
40 L 3954 10
41 L 4113 5 4+ 0.039
42 L 4164 5
43 L 4225 6
44 L 4262 5
45 L 4321 6
46 L 4356 6
47 L 4406 6

204Hg *204HG(D,PNG) 1984SC19 94NDS 199411
204 80 I 14 16 0 0 0 0
H TYP=FUL$AUT=M. R. SCHMORAK$CIT=NDS 72,409 (1994)$CUT=1-Sep-1994$
C 98% 204HG, E(D)=25 MEV. PG-coin GE(LI) plastic scin; GG; CE(T)
2C magnetic spectrometer; G(THETA) (1984Sc19)
CG RI Estimated uncertainty 10-20%
CG M From G(THETA) and CE (1984Sc19)
CL J$From 1984Sc19 based on G(THETA) and EKC, and from adopted levels
1 L 0 0+
2 L 436.60 10 2+
1 G 436.6 1 100 E2
3 L 1128.50 15 4+
2 G 691.9 1 63
4 L 1828.6 5 (2)
2 G 1392.0 5 3.1
5 L 1851.69 24 (2+)
3 G 723.2 2 3.7
2 G 1414.8
6 L 1947.3 5 1+,2+
2 G 1510.7 5 2.6
7 L 1988.7 5 (2+,3-)
2 G 1552.1 5 2.6
8 L 2190.90 25 6+
3 G 1062.4 2 17
9 L 2236.0 4
3 G 1107.5 3 2.9
3 CG E$placement based on the placement of the 1107.7 1 GAMMA in (N,N'G)
10 L 2262.9 4 5-
3 G 1134.4 3 18 E1
3 CG M from CE and G(THETA) this is a stretched E1.
11 L 2300.5 4 (2)
3 G 1172.0 3 3.1
3 CG E$placement based on the placement of the 1172.0 1 GAMMA in (N,N'G)
12 L 2300.5 4 7- 6.7 NS 5
12 CL J see adopted levels
8 G 109.6 2 6.0 E1
13 L 2724.2 4 GE 5
11 G 423.7 2 4.0
? 10 G 460.5 10 1 AP
14 L 2760.4 4 GE 3
10 G 497.5 2 3.2
? 8 G 569.5 10 1 AP

204Hg *204HG(D,D') 1972MO12 94NDS 199411
204 80 I 4 0 0 0 0 0
H TYP=FUL$AUT=M. R. SCHMORAK$CIT=NDS 72,409 (1994)$CUT=1-Sep-1994$
C E(D)=17 MEV, 95.8% 204HG; FWHM=9 KEV; d'(THETA) (1972Mo12).
1 L 0
2 L 443 8
3 L 1140 12
? 4 L 1851 15

204Hg *204HG(A,A') 1981BA45 94NDS 199411
204 80 I 5 0 0 0 0 0
H TYP=FUL$AUT=M. R. SCHMORAK$CIT=NDS 72,409 (1994)$CUT=1-Sep-1994$
1C 84% 204HG, E(A)=27 MEV, magnetic spectrograph A'(THETA), FWHM=40 KEV
2C coupled-channels analysis (1981Ba45).
CL J From 1981Ba45 based on A'(THETA).
1 L 0 0+
2 L 437 5 2+
2 CL BETA(2)=0.061
3 L 1128 5
4 L 2272 5
5 L 2674 5 (3-)
5 CL BETA(3)=0.076 octupole vibration

204Hg *COULOMB EXCITATION 94NDS 199411
204 80 I 7 5 0 0 0 0
H TYP=FUL$AUT=M. R. SCHMORAK$CIT=NDS 72,409 (1994)$CUT=1-Sep-1994$
C 98% 204HG sulphide target. 1040-MEV 208PB beam. Particle-GAMMA coin
2C GE(LI) and position-sensitive plate avalanche detectors, G(THETA).
3C BE2 values are normalized to 0.0849 for the 2+ to 0+ transition (an
4C average of 1981Es03 and 1979Bo02). A 5% systematic error was included
5C in the quoted uncertainties in BE2 (1985Ag01).
1C 4HE 13.5-16.5 MEV, 12C 45-56 MEV, 16O 63-65 MEV; 93% 204HG
2C annular SI detector for backward scattering. E(P)=18 MEV E-DE counter
3C telescope, Winther-de Boer analysis (1981Es03).
1C Natural HG; 15 MEV 4HE, 56-64 MEV 16O; gammas GE(LI); MOME2 of
2C 436 level measured by reorientation effect (1979Bo02)
C E(A)=11-15 MEV, E(16O)=56 MEV, Winther-de Boer analysis (1977BoYP)
C E(16O)=36 MEV, RI(THETA) in vacuum and HE gas (1974Do01)
1C E(12C)=54, 55 MEV. 92.6% 204HG, mag spect. BE3 deduced (1991Li03).
CG RI From 1985Ag01
CG E$From 1985Ag01, 1979Bo02
CG M$From 1981Es03, 1985Ag01
CL J From adopted levels
1 L 0 0+
2 L 436.55 32+
22 L MOME2=0.40 20 (1981ES03)
2 CL MOME2: 0.39 20 or 0.24 20 (1979Bo02)
21CL From attenuation of G(THETA) of recoils in vacuum
22CL OMEGA**2*TAU=4.1 7 (changed by evaluator from 4.6 8 of 1974Do01 because
23CL of change in T1/2(436 level) from 36 PS to 40.4 PS); therefore,
24CL MOMM1(204HG)/MOMM1(198HG)=0.89 8. Using MOMM1(198HG)=1.1 2
25CL (1977Ha26,1964Ko15) we get MOMM1(204HG)=1.0 3. Others: 1970Ka09,
2xCL 1973Di15
1 G 436.55 3 100 E2 0.04
1 CG BE2=0.0849 8 (from 0.0846 10 (1981Es03) and 0.0854 12
1xCG (1979Bo02))
3 L 1128.45 21 4+
2 G 691.9 2 19.9 6 E2 0.013
2 CG BE2=0.121 9 (1985Ag01), 0.19 6 (1981Es03)
4 L 1987.9 (2+,3-)
? 2 G 1551.3 2 0.11 1
? 2 CG Placement from (D,PNG) and 204AU B- decay, adopted
? 22CG EG=1552.78 10
5 L 2191.0 4 6+
3 G 1062.5 3 1.36 4 E2 0.005
3 CG BE2=0.139 17 (1985Ag01)
6 L 2515.1 6
3 G 1386.6 5 0.24 3
3 CG E$placement based on (N,N'G), adopted EG=1386.2 2
7 L 2682 3 3-
7 CL E seen in (P,P') of 1981Es03 and 1991Ho07
72 L BE3=0.37 5
7 CL The BE3 value corresponds to 22 W.u. ^and is comparable
72CL to the values for collective 3- states in the even HG isotopes GE 198
73CL (in (E,E') the measured BE3W=24 2)

204Hg *205TL(E,E'P) 1987QU01 94NDS 199411
204 80 I 4 0 0 0 0 0
H TYP=FUL$AUT=M. R. SCHMORAK$CIT=NDS 72,409 (1994)$CUT=1-Sep-1994$
C E(E)=410 MEV, spectra at the missing momentum values of
2C 15, 80, and 160 ^MEV/c were measured. FWHM=135 KEV for the proton
3C energy.
CL S$Spectroscopic factor for 3s1/2 is listed.
1 L 0 0.32 3
2 L 1640 10 0.22 2
3 L 2370 20 0.08 1
4 L 2620 30 0.05 1

204Hg *205TL(MU-,NG) 94NDS 199411
204 80 I 14 13 0 0 0 0
H TYP=FUL$AUT=M. R. SCHMORAK$CIT=NDS 72,409 (1994)$CUT=1-Sep-1994$
C The decay scheme is suggested by evaluator on the basis of
2C 204AU B- decay and (D,PNG).
CL J From adopted levels
CG RI Per 100 MU- stops in natural TL (1972Ba53)
CG E From 1972Ba53 except for the 436G from 1978Du01
CG E(E) Assigned to 204HG by evaluator
1 L 0 0+
2 L 436.551 8 2+
1 G 436.551 8 25.4 41
3 L 1128.26 17 4+
2 G 691.71 17 7.6 9
2F G FLAG=E
4 L 1827.9 4 (2)
2 G 1391.3 4 0.68 17
2F G FLAG=E
5 L 1841.4 10 1+,2+
S 2 G 1404.82
6 L 1948.2 3 1+,2+
2 G 1511.6 3 1.5 3
2F G FLAG=E
7 L 1990.5 4 (2+,3-)
2 G 1553.9 4 0.96 24
2F G FLAG=E
8 L 2140.5 4 1,2,3
2 G 1703.9 4 0.7 2
2F G FLAG=E
9 L 2191.0 11 6+
S 3 G 1062.7
10 L 2262.9 3 5-
3 G 1134.67 20 3.0 6
3F G FLAG=E
11 L 2264.6 5 1,2,3
2 G 1828.0 5 0.50 16
12 L 2300.6 11 7-
9 G 109.68 12 0.98 18
9F G FLAG=E
13 L 2726.2 6 (2+,3)
3 G 1597.9 5 0.62 17
3F G FLAG=E
14 L 2760.7 4 GE 3
10 G 497.8 3 0.77 22
10F G FLAG=E

204Hg *205TL(D,3HE) 1989GR09 94NDS 199411
204 80 I 21 0 0 0 0 0
H TYP=FUL$AUT=M. R. SCHMORAK$CIT=NDS 72,409 (1994)$CUT=1-Sep-1994$
C JPI(target)=1/2+
1C Enriched 205TL, E(D)=45 MEV, magnetic spectrometer. Results are
2C preliminary, no uncertainties given (1983AgZY)
1C 99.5% 205TL, E(D)=52 MEV, polarized beam average polarization of 0.54
2C FWHM=110 KEV for vector-polarized beam, FWHM=70 KEV for unpolarized
3C beam. DWBA calc normalized to 208PB(D,3HE) (1989Gr09)
CL E,L$From 1989Gr09, DE AP 15 KEV. See also: 1987Cl01
CL J$From 1989Gr09 based on L transfer, vector analyzing power and
2CL previous NDS assignments.
CL E(C) Unresolved multiplet
CL S$Spectroscopic factors for L=0 are from 3s1/2, for L=2 below 2.7
2CL MEV are from 2d3/2 and above 2.7 MEV from 2d5/2 (except for 3320
3CL level 2d3/2), for L=5 are from 1h11/2. For cases of two L values,
4CL the ^S factors are listed in the order s1/2,d3/2,h11/2,d5/2. In
5CL cases where one of the L values is even and the other is odd, it
6CL is clear that at least two levels with opposite parities contribute.
1 L 0 0+ 0 .21
2 L 437 2+ 2 .18
3 L 1130 4+
4 L 1630 (0,1)+ 0 .16
5 L 1840 1+,2+ 2 .14
6 L 1950 2+ 2 .28
7 L 2060 AP (1,2,3)+ 2 .05
8 L 2120 (1,2)+ 2 .14
9 L 2250 5- 2,5 .04, .21
9F L FLAG=C
10 L 2380 (0,1,2,3)+ 0,2 .05, .04
10 CL J$JPI=1+ if only one state contributes
11 L 2470 (1,2,3)+ 2 .03
12 L 2650 (0,1,2,3)+ 0,2 .08, .03
12F L FLAG=C
13 L 2770 2,5 .20, .16
13F L FLAG=C
14 L 2890 2,5 .16, .10
14F L FLAG=C
15 L 3050 2,5 .12, .05
15F L FLAG=C
16 L 3190 (2,3)+ 2 .41
17 L 3320 2,5 .07, .05
17F L FLAG=C
18 L 3460 (1,2,3)+ 2 .13
19 L 3600 2,5 .03, .11
19F L FLAG=C
20 L 3770 (1,2,3)+ 2 .05
21 L 3890 (0,1,2,3)+ 0,2 .05, .06

204Hg *208PB(D,6LI) 1979BE14 94NDS 199411
204 80 I 9 0 0 0 0 0
H TYP=FUL$AUT=M. R. SCHMORAK$CIT=NDS 72,409 (1994)$CUT=1-Sep-1994$
1C E(D)=55 MEV; magnetic spectrograph, E DE counter; 99% 208PB,
2C FWHM=150-300 KEV; 6LI(THETA). ALPHA clustering calculated (1979Be14)
CL J From 1979Be14 based on DWBA, natural parity favored
1 L 0 0+
2 L 430 50 2+
3 L 1085 50(4+)
? 4 L 1810 50
5 L 2240 50 GE 3
6 L 2740 50 GE 2
7 L 2800 50
8 L 3040 50 GE 2
9 L 3550 50 GE 2